Suppression of reading materials as a supression of creative thoughts

He responds to a question he is frequently asked: This paradox was described in T herapy and the Postpartum Woman Kleiman, using the metaphor of a filled water balloon. It is the responsibility of publishers and librarians, as guardians of the people's freedom to read, to contest encroachments upon that freedom by individuals or groups seeking to impose their own standards or tastes upon the community at large; and by the government whenever it seeks to reduce or deny public access to public information.

Actions that take the person into anxiety-creating situations may also be avoided. Freedom keeps open the path of novel and creative solutions, and enables change to come by choice.

Such pressure toward conformity is perhaps natural to a time of accelerated change. The bearer of every new thought is a rebel until that idea is refined and tested. However, as the feelings are still held in the subconscious, they continue to gnaw and create a sense of underlying and wearying low-level discomfort.

Evidence from Brown that showed participants were very sensitive to frequency information prompted Clarke, Ball and Pape to obtain participants' aposterio estimates of the number of intrusive target thoughts and found the same pattern of paradoxical results.

Parents and teachers have a responsibility to prepare the young to meet the diversity of experiences in life to which they will be exposed, as they have a responsibility to help them learn to think critically for themselves.

Experiential avoidance is when an individual attempts to suppress, change, or control unwanted internal experiences thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations, memories, etc. Later, these items become retrieval cues for the thought attempting to be suppressed [10] i. Studies could also use the "independent probe" method, which gives the category and first letter of the second word of the pair.


Our instinct is often to push them out of our head. After studying the first list, some participants are told to forget everything that they have just learned, while others are not given this instruction. Bibliography The Censorship Iceberg: But is not much of life itself shocking?

These are affirmative responsibilities, not to be discharged simply by preventing them from reading works for which they are not yet prepared. As in experiments using the list method, the words followed by the instruction to forget are more poorly remembered.

Macrae, Bodenhausen, Milne, and Jetten found that when people were asked not to think about the stereotypes of a certain group e. We do not state these propositions in the comfortable belief that what people read is unimportant.

This may be problematic because of response distortion or inaccuracy in self-reporting. Then seek to trigger their release - which can be in a huge torrent, for example of anger and crying although more gentle release may also occur.

An example of a possible word pair is roach-ordeal.

Thought suppression

For example, a person has been unkind to another and then avoids thinking about it, as this would lead to uncomfortable feelings of shame and the dissonance of knowing they had acted outside of common human values.

The reasoning for that is lack of motivation and rejection. A lot of people including myself fear rejection. We cut off literature at the source if we prevent writers from dealing with the stuff of life. We here stake out a lofty claim for the value of the written word.

These day, an average elementary school student knows many things. Further, democratic societies are more safe, free, and creative when the free flow of public information is not restricted by governmental prerogative or self-censorship. The freedom to read is of little consequence when the reader cannot obtain matter fit for that reader's purpose.

It is Something too vague perhaps to be defined. Freedom has given the United States the elasticity to endure strain. It is in the public interest for publishers and librarians to make available the widest diversity of views and expressions, including those that are unorthodox, unpopular, or considered dangerous by the majority.

I find the use of this image most helpful when used in conjunction with a sound bite and gesture. And yet suppression is never more dangerous than in such a time of social tension.

The defense of the freedom to read requires of all publishers and librarians the utmost of their faculties, and deserves of all Americans the fullest of their support. For example, a person has been unkind to another and then avoids thinking about it, as this would lead to uncomfortable feelings of shame and the dissonance of knowing they had acted outside of common human values.

Every silencing of a heresy, every enforcement of an orthodoxy, diminishes the toughness and resilience of our society and leaves it the less able to deal with controversy and difference. But no group has the right to take the law into its own hands, and to impose its own concept of politics or morality upon other members of a democratic society.

We believe that publishers and librarians have a profound responsibility to give validity to that freedom to read by making it possible for the readers to choose freely from a variety of offerings. And younger children should be prevented from borrowing material intended for an older age group.

Essay/Term paper: Censorship

It is contrary to the public interest for publishers or librarians to bar access to writings on the basis of the personal history or political affiliations of the author.

In an attempt to account for these findings, a number of theorists have produced cognitive models of thought suppression.Given that distressing thought, called obsessions, are at the core of OCD, it has been suggested thought suppression may play a role in causing some of the symptoms of OCD.

For instance, although we all experience strange, bizarre or shocking thoughts throughout the day, if you have OCD, you may overreact to such thoughts by trying to suppress them, which only causes them to come back worse.

Freedom of Obscenity: The Suppression of Reading Material Is Suppression of Creative Thought PAGES 2. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: freedom of obscenity, suppression of reading material, suppression of creative thought.

Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami. Thought suppression is a type of motivated forgetting when an individual consciously attempts to stop thinking about a particular thought. It is often associated with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Does an Open Office Plan Make a Creative Environment?

Thought suppression refers to the deliberate act of trying to force the unwanted information out of your awareness.

Continue Reading. - Censorship is the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined as determined by the government, media outlet, or other controlling bodies.

Suppressing emotions, or just trying to push emotional thoughts and feelings out of your mind, is an emotion regulation strategy many people use.

When used from time to time, it doesn’t have dramatic negative consequences.

Suppression of reading materials as a supression of creative thoughts
Rated 5/5 based on 83 review